Strelecki v. Oklahoma Tax Commission
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
OPALA, Justice.-
The issue urged upon us on review is whether the new rule of federal law announced in Davis v. Michigan Dept, of Trea*911sury1 applies retroactively to require refunds — on Taxpayers’ timely claims for a correct amount — of state income tax overpay-ments on Taxpayers’ federal retirement income excludable under Davis? We answer in the affirmative. The U.S. Supreme Court’s recent jurisprudence in Harper v. Virginia Dept, of Taxation2 — which applies the retroactivity analysis of James B. Beam Distilling Co. v. Georgia3 — mandates retroactive application of the nondiscrimination…
2Cases cited79 opinions
- Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Linkletter v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by75 opinions
- Keating v. EdmondsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
- Russell v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
- Cox v. DawsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
- Jackson v. Oklahoma Memorial HospitalSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- Anderson v. EichnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.