Legal Opinion

Strelecki v. Oklahoma Tax Commission

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 23, 1994No. 77615PublishedCited by 75 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPALA, Justice.-

The issue urged upon us on review is whether the new rule of federal law announced in Davis v. Michigan Dept, of Trea*911sury1 applies retroactively to require refunds — on Taxpayers’ timely claims for a correct amount — of state income tax overpay-ments on Taxpayers’ federal retirement income excludable under Davis? We answer in the affirmative. The U.S. Supreme Court’s recent jurisprudence in Harper v. Virginia Dept, of Taxation2 — which applies the retroactivity analysis of James B. Beam Distilling Co. v. Georgia3 — mandates retroactive application of the nondiscrimination…

2Cases cited79 opinions

  1. Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Linkletter v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by75 opinions

  1. Keating v. EdmondsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
  2. Russell v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
  3. Cox v. DawsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
  4. Jackson v. Oklahoma Memorial HospitalSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  5. Anderson v. EichnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994

70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API