Legal Opinion

McGurk v. Moore

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 10, 1951No. 110PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtErvin, J.

Under tbe statute, a notice of Us pendens can be filed against real property only in an action affecting its title. G.S. 1-116. Tbe appeal, therefore, presents this primary question: Does tbe complaint state a cause of action affecting tbe title to tbe land beld by tbe defendants as tenants by tbe entirety?

In passing on this inquiry, we accept as true the factual averments of tbe complaint. We are not bound, however, by the legal conclusions of the pleader.

When one partner wrongfully takes partnership funds and uses them to buy or improve property, his co-partners may obtain redress in one of…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Holmes v. . GilmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  2. Spier v. LangCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Crone v. CroneIllinois Supreme Court · 1899
  4. In re the Estate of ErlangerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1932
  5. Provident Trust Co. v. RankinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Cutter v. CUTTER REALTY COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  2. Johnson Ex Rel. Dickson v. GillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  3. Williams v. Biscuitville, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  4. Bennett v. ANSON BANK & TRUST COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  5. Anderson v. Brokers, Inc. (In Re Brokers, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2007

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API