Legal Opinion

Barefield v. La Salle Coca-Cola Bottling Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 5, 1963No. Calendar 108, 109, Docket 49,160, 49,161PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSouris, J.

The defendant beverage producer won jury verdicts of no cause in these consolidated suits by husband and wife for its alleged breach of an implied warranty that its product was fit for human consumption. Plaintiff wife claims to have been injured by particles of glass she ingested while consuming the contents of a bottle of defendant’s product. Her husband’s suit sought recovery of medical expenses and damages for loss of her services. For convenience, we shall speak only in terms of the wife’s action, for her husband’s right to recover depends entirely upon her right to recover.

Plaintiff…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hertzler v. ManshumMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Manzoni v. Detroit Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Bahlman v. Hudson Motor Car Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Cheli v. Cudahy Bros. Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1934

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Moning v. AlfonoMichigan Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Williams v. Brown Manufacturing Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Piercefield v. Remington Arms Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Hill v. Harbor Steel & Supply Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Williams v. Detroit Edison Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1975

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API