Legal Opinion
Cumberland Pipe Line Co. v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
Decided March 15, 1929PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion op the Court by
Judge Dietzman
Affirming
The sole question presented by this appeal is whether chapter 122 of the Acts of 1918, hereinafter called the 1918 act, violates the Federal Constitution or not. The title to that act is:
“An Act to amend and re-enact chapter 9 of the Acts of the extraordinary session of the General Assembly of 1917, which Act imposes a license or franchise on any person, firm, corporation, or association engaged in the production of crude petroleum in this State, and authorizing' county officials to impose such tax for roads, schools and county purposes ;…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Flint v. Stone Tracy Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Maine v. Grand Trunk Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Heisler v. Thomas Colliery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Brown-Forman Co. v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Oliver Iron Mining Co. v. LordSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Poplar Creek Development Co. v. Chesapeake Appalachia, L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
- Commonwealth v. Kentucky Jockey ClubCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
- City of Louisville v. SebreeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1948
- Schroeder v. Terra Energy, Ltd.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1997
- State Ex Rel. Snidow v. State Board of EqualizationMontana Supreme Court · 1932
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.