Legal Opinion

Oliver Iron Mining Co. v. Lord

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 21, 1923No. 560-566PublishedCited by 185 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Van Devanter

These are suits to restrain and prevent the enforcement of a taxing act adopted by the State of Minnesota, April 11, 1921, c. 223, Laws 1921. The principal sections of the act are copied in the margin 1 and may be summarized as follows: The first subjects all who are “engaged in the business of mining or producing iron ore or other ores” within the State to the payment in each year of “ an occupation tax ” equal to 6 per cent, of the value of the ore mined or produced during the preceding year,— such tax to be “ in addition to all other taxes.” The second directs that the tax be computed on…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. United Mine Workers v. Coronado Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Hendrick v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. Kidd v. PearsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  4. Hammer v. DagenhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  5. New York Ex Rel. Hatch v. ReardonSupreme Court of the United States · 1907

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by185 opinions

  1. National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Parker v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Wickard v. FilburnSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. United States v. DarbySupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. Allied Stores of Ohio, Inc. v. BowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1959

180 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API