Oliver Iron Mining Co. v. Lord
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Van Devanter
These are suits to restrain and prevent the enforcement of a taxing act adopted by the State of Minnesota, April 11, 1921, c. 223, Laws 1921. The principal sections of the act are copied in the margin 1 and may be summarized as follows: The first subjects all who are “engaged in the business of mining or producing iron ore or other ores” within the State to the payment in each year of “ an occupation tax ” equal to 6 per cent, of the value of the ore mined or produced during the preceding year,— such tax to be “ in addition to all other taxes.” The second directs that the tax be computed on…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- United Mine Workers v. Coronado Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Hendrick v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Kidd v. PearsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Hammer v. DagenhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- New York Ex Rel. Hatch v. ReardonSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by185 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Parker v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Wickard v. FilburnSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- United States v. DarbySupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Allied Stores of Ohio, Inc. v. BowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
180 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.