Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Snidow v. State Board of Equalization

Montana Supreme Court

Decided December 13, 1932No. 6,983PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion in this case was handed down last July. In due time motions for rehearing were filed by the relators and the respondent Anaconda Copper Mining Company. We have given the entire subject, as presented by the pleadings, further intensive study, and have concluded, in the interest of accuracy and clarity, to revise the opinion.

This is an original proceeding in mandamus. Upon the filing of the verified petition of the relators, an alternative writ was issued and served. The respondents State Board of Equalization, and James H. Stewart, D.J. Muri and John J. Greene, individually and as…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. F. S. Royster Guano Co. v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  2. Louisville Gas & Electric Co. v. ColemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  3. Hope Natural Gas Co. v. Hall, State Tax CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  4. Dosen v. East Butte Copper Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1918

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. McDaniel v. Chevron Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  2. Dunphy v. Anaconda CompanyMontana Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Werre v. DavidMontana Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Rider v. CooneyMontana Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Fulmer v. Board of Railroad CommissionersMontana Supreme Court · 1934

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API