Legal Opinion
In re Fresh & Process Potatoes Antitrust Litigation
District Court, D. Idaho
Decided December 2, 2011No. Case No. 4:10-MD-2186-BLWPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*1148MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER
B. LYNN WINMILL, Chief Judge.
INTRODUCTION
The Court has before it several pending motions (Dkts. 72, 73, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 82, 85, 88,120 and 122). The Court heard oral argument on the motions on June 20, 2011,1 and now issues the following memorandum decision and order.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiffs are a company who claims to have purchased potatoes directly from one or more of the defendants, and a series of persons or entities who allege they have indirectly purchased potatoes from one or more of the defendants. The former is referred to as direct purchaser plaintiffs…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Kristensen v. Credit Payment ServicesDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2014
- Coppola v. SmithDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2013
- Mountain Crest SRL, LLC v. Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NVCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
- Brown v. JBS USA Food CompanyDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2023
- In re: RealPage, Inc., Rental Software Antitrust Litigation (No. II)District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2025
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.