Legal Opinion

Lee v. Georgia-Pacific Corp.

District Court, S.D. Mississippi

Decided March 12, 1996No. 3:94-cv-00711PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

WINGATE, District Judge.

Before the court is the defendant’s motion for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56(b) 1 of the Federal Rules of Civil Proce dure and plaintiffs motion for additional time for discovery pursuant to Rule 56(f). 2 By its motion, defendant Georgia-Pacific Corporation (“Georgia-Pacific”) attacks the legal and factual sufficiency of plaintiffs complaint which asserts: (1) that defendant terminated plaintiffs employment because of his race and age in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Title 42 U.S.C. § 2000e 3 et seq., (“Title…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Robert MAYBERRY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. VOUGHT AIRCRAFT COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ellison v. Darden Restaurants, Inc.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API