Lee v. Georgia-Pacific Corp.
District Court, S.D. Mississippi
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
WINGATE, District Judge.
Before the court is the defendant’s motion for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56(b) 1 of the Federal Rules of Civil Proce dure and plaintiffs motion for additional time for discovery pursuant to Rule 56(f). 2 By its motion, defendant Georgia-Pacific Corporation (“Georgia-Pacific”) attacks the legal and factual sufficiency of plaintiffs complaint which asserts: (1) that defendant terminated plaintiffs employment because of his race and age in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Title 42 U.S.C. § 2000e 3 et seq., (“Title…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Robert MAYBERRY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. VOUGHT AIRCRAFT COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Ellison v. Darden Restaurants, Inc.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1999