Legal Opinion
Bartholomew v. City of Burlington, Kan.
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided April 7, 1998No. Civ.A. 96-4184-DESPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
SAFFELS, District Judge.
I. BACKGROUND
Kendel and Kristi Bartholomew, former employees of the City of Burlington, Kansas, seek overtime compensation allegedly due under the Fair Labor Standards Act, (“FLSA”) 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq. Both plaintiffs seek overtime compensation for time spent “on-call” as employees of the City of Burlington. Plaintiffs also seek overtime compensation for time spent in briefings pri- or to going on shift. Plaintiffs claim compensatory damages, liquidated damages, and attorney’s fees.
The City of Burlington (“City”) denies liability under the FLSA…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Baker v. McCollanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- William Russell Aiken v. City of Memphis, TennesseeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- Adams v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- Powell v. Carey International, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2007
- Manners v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 2000
- Minocha v. Mercedes-Benz, USA LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2022