Legal Opinion
William Russell Aiken v. City of Memphis, Tennessee
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided September 7, 1999No. 97-6371PublishedCited by 93 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCole, J., joined by Martin, C. J.,
RYAN, J. (pp. 762-65), delivered a separate opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part.
COLE, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs, past and present Memphis police officers, brought an action against the city of Memphis asserting various claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA or Act), 29 U.S.C. §§ 201 et seq. Plaintiffs currently appeal the district court’s dismissal of two of those claims on summary judgment and the court’s final judgment in favor of the city on three other claims. For the following reasons, we AFFIRM the judgments of the district court.
I
Plaintiffs filed this action on…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Armour & Co. v. WantockSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by93 opinions
- Emil Ewolski v. City of BrunswickCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- Great Earth Companies, Inc., and Great Earth International Franchising Corp. v. Richard Simons and Kimberly SimonsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- Kenneth C. Voyticky v. Village of Timberlake, OhioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- Block v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Wendy Elwell, Plaintiff-Appellee v. University Hospitals Home Care Services, Defendant-Appellant/ Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.