Legal Opinion

State v. Cornelius

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 13, 1965No. 261PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Per curiam

The appellant has only one assignment of error and it purports to be based on a portion of the charge to which no exception was taken as required by the Rules of this Court. Even so, the portion of the charge complained of is set out under the assignment of error and consists in its entirety of a contention of the State.

We have repeatedly held that an inadvertence in stating contentions or in recapitulating the evidence must be called to the attention of the court in time for correction. After verdict, the objection comes too late. S. v. Case, 253 N.C. 130, 116 S.E. 2d 429; S. v. Holder, 252…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. CaseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  2. State v. AdamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  3. State v. HolderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. GoinesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  2. State v. DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  3. State v. ClaytonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  4. State v. KingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  5. State v. McAllisterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API