Legal Opinion

State v. Holder

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 2, 1960No. 145PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

The defendant asked for a new trial solely upon the ground that the court committed error in recapitulating the defendant’s evidence and contentions and that he was prejudiced by the reference to the treatment of alcoholism.

Inadvertence in stating the contentions or in recapitulating the evidence must be called to the attention of the court in time for correction. After verdict the objection' comes too late. State v. Adams, 245 N.C. 344, 95 S.E. 2d 902.

No error.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. AdamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. GoinesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  2. State v. VirgilSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  3. State v. CaseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  4. State v. McAllisterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  5. State v. BlackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API