Legal Opinion

State v. King

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 26, 1975No. 8PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOORE, Justice.

Joseph King moved for a separate trial and assigns as error the denial of his motion. These defendants were charged in separate bills of indictment with identical crimes. The offenses charged are of the same class, relate to the same crimes and are so connected in time and place that most of the evidence at the trial on one of the indictments would be competent and admissible at the trial on the others. Each defendant relied on an alibi as a defense and their defenses were not antagonistic. Under such circumstances, the trial judge was authorized by G.S. 15-152 (repealed by…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. State v. BullardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  2. State v. CovingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  3. State v. IrickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  4. State v. HardySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  5. State v. ZunigaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API