Legal Opinion
Clark v. Milam
District Court, S.D. West Virginia
Decided December 1, 1993No. Civ. A. No. 2:92-0935PublishedCited by 82 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
HADEN, Chief Judge.
Pending are Plaintiffs motion urging this Court to reconsider its August 16, 1993 Order denying as untimely Plaintiffs motion to strike affirmative defenses, and Plaintiffs renewed motion to strike affirmative defenses.
Plaintiff requests the Court strike from Defendants’ pleadings certain affirmative defenses Plaintiff claims are legally insufficient, vague and unintelligible, or otherwise inconsistent with the requirements of Rule 8(e), Fed.R.Civ.P. By Order entered August 16, 1993, the Court denied as untimely Plaintiffs initial motion to…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Anchor Hocking Corp. v. Jacksonville Electric AuthorityDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1976
- Gary K. Mosel v. Hills Department Store, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
- Spell v. McDanielDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1984
- United States v. Pretty Products, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1991
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by82 opinions
- Clark County School District v. Richardson Construction, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2007
- Hardy v. Lewis Gale Medical Center, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2019
- Haley Paint Co. v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 2012
- Voss v. Pujdak (In Re Pujdak)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina · 2011
- Racick v. Dominion Law AssociatesDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2010
77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.