Legal Opinion
Gary K. Mosel v. Hills Department Store, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided May 1, 1986No. 85-3567PublishedCited by 79 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
In this employment discrimination case, the district court granted defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint as untimely filed. We will affirm.
The relevant facts are not in dispute. On April 17,1984, plaintiff Gary K. Mosel filed a charge against defendant Hills Department Store, Inc. with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), alleging that he was terminated from his job in retaliation for filing earlier sex discrimination complaints against defendant. On December 3, 1984, plaintiff, through his attorney, requested that the EEOC issue a right-to-sue letter…
3Cases cited8 opinions
- Zipes v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Baldwin County Welcome Center v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Addie JOHNSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AL TECH SPECIALTIES STEEL CORP., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- Marion S. RICE, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. NEW ENGLAND COLLEGE, Defendant, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1982
- Donald Oliver HORNSBY, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICECourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by79 opinions
- Timothy M. Burgh v. Borough Council of the Borough of Montrose Timothy BurghCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- Seitzinger v. Reading Hosp. and Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- Figueroa v. Buccaneer Hotel Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- Truitt v. County of WayneCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- Clark v. MilamDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1993
74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.