People v. Romer
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
Defendants were convicted of the crime of burglary under five counts, and the crime of robbery under seven counts. Their motions for a new trial being denied, this appeal was taken. In a voluminous brief they argue that the evidence against them is weak and that any serious errors must be deemed prejudicial. Their evidence was chiefly directed to the defense of alibi, to offset the testimony of identification. Nevertheless, they do not contend that the evidence is insufficient to support the verdict on any of the twelve counts, and it is therefore unnecessary for us to engage in any…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In Re RosencrantzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- People v. Chin HaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- People v. La VerneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- People v. PutmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
3Cited by23 opinions
- People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- State v. OwenIdaho Supreme Court · 1953
- People v. DavidCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- People v. CobbCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- People v. RichardsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.