Legal Opinion
Black v. Arthur
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided August 25, 1998No. Civil 97-1798-HAPublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
HAGGERTY, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiffs filed this case on December 18, 1997, challenging the U.S. Forest Service noncommercial group use regulation. On May 11, 1998, defendants moved to dismiss all counts for failure to state a claim pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Upon review of the complaint and the parties’ briefs, this court grants defendants’ motion to dismiss for the reasons set forth below.
II. BACKGROUND
The present case stems from a 1997 “Annual Rainbow Family Gathering” in the Ochoco National Forest in central Oregon. Before the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Haguer v. Committee for Industrial OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- American Farm Bureau v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2000
- Jane Does I Through III v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2002
- United States v. Michael D. Linick Henry G. Bailey, IIICourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- New Vision Photography Program, Inc. v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- United States v. Joan H. Kalb, in No. 00-1733 United States of America v. Garrick M. Beck, in No. 00-1734 United States v. Stephen M. Sedlacko, in No. 00-1746Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.