Legal Opinion
United States v. Michael D. Linick Henry G. Bailey, III
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 9, 1999No. 98-10502PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WIGGINS, Circuit Judge:
The United States appeals the district court’s dismissal of an information filed against defendants Michael D. Linick and Henry G. Bailey, III (collectively “Defendants”). The information charged Defendants with the use of the Apache-Sit-greaves National Forest without a permit in violation of 16 U.S.C. § 551 and related Forest Service regulations. In dismissing the information, the district court ruled that the language of 36 C.F.R. § 251.56(a)(2)(vii) was overbroad, which rendered unconstitutional the Forest Service’s regulatory scheme for the noncommercial group use…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Clark v. Community for Creative Non-ViolenceSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Freedman v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Shuttlesworth v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- City of Lakewood v. Plain Dealer Publishing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Long Beach Area Peace v. City of Long BeachCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Gammoh v. City of La HabraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Patrick J. Griffin, Iii, and Gregory S. Clemmer v. Secretary of Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Zachery K. Griefen Forrest Gray Michael Bowersox Rachael Lynn Warns Sean Ethan GaleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Long Beach Area Peace Network v. City of Long BeachCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.