Legal Opinion
Fox v. Ickes
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided June 30, 1943No. 8263-8265PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ARNOLD, Associate Justice.
In 1905, under the authority of the Reclamation Act 1 the Secretary of the Interior undertook the construction and operation of the Yakima Project to irrigate lands in the State of Washington. In connection with this project the United States appropriated the unappropriated waters of the Yakima River under the statutes of the State of Washington. 2 It has kept these appropriations in good standing.
The appellants in the three appeals, which are consolidated here, have water-rights in the Sunnyside Division of the Yakima Project. These rights are based on water-right…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ickes v. FoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Tulare Irrigation District v. Lindsay-Strathmore Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Commonwealth Trust Co. of Pittsburgh v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Barrows v. FoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District v. BondSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- H.F. Allen Orchards, Elbert B. Schinmann, R.E. Redman & Sons, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- United States v. Alpine Land & Reservoir Co.District Court, D. Nevada · 1980
- Kittitas Reclamation District United States of America v. Sunnyside Valley Irrigation DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Klamath Irrigation District v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- United States v. Alpine Land & Reservoir Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.