Legal Opinion
United States v. Alpine Land & Reservoir Co.
District Court, D. Nevada
Decided October 28, 1980No. Civ. D-183 BRTPublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BRUCE R. THOMPSON, District Judge.
This is a quiet title suit to adjudicate the rights to the use of the water of Carson River in Nevada and California. The case was tried before the Court and John V. Mueller, a Special Master, the Master having heretofore submitted proposed findings of fact, conclusions of law and decree. Objections to the Master’s report have been filed by the parties and further trial proceedings to resolve those objections have been held before the Court as provided by the proposed preliminary pretrial order heretofore filed and approved by the Court on October 20,…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Arizona v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- California v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. Gerlach Live Stock Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- United States v. New MexicoSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Ickes v. FoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- United States v. Alpine Land & Reservoir, Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Churchill County v. NortonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. City & County of Denver Ex Rel. Board of Water CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
- United States v. Alpine Land and Reservoir Co., and Truckee-Carson Irrigation District, United States of America v. Alpine Land and Reservoir Co., and Truckee-Carson Irrigation District v. Pyramid Lake Paiute Tribe of IndiansCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Alpine Land & Reservoir Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.