Legal Opinion
Kittitas Reclamation District United States of America v. Sunnyside Valley Irrigation District
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 10, 1980No. 78-3065PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
J. BLAINE ANDERSON, Circuit Judge:
In this action, as part of its continuing jurisdiction over a consent decree entered in 1945, the district court entered a Memorandum and Order interpreting and administering the consent decree. Sunnyside Valley Irrigation District (Sunnyside) appeals that Memorandum and Order.
I. FACTS
This case had its genesis in a declaratory action in 1939. The action had been instituted to determine the obligation of the United States Bureau of Reclamation to deliver water to the Sunnyside Valley Irrigation District, which was situated in the Yakima Reclamation Project. A…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. ITT Continental Baking Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. Armour & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- California v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Libby, McNeill, & Libby v. City National BankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- Republic Pictures Corp. v. RogersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Klamath-Lake Pharmaceutical Ass'n v. Klamath Medical Service BureauCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Vertex Distributing, Inc. v. Falcon Foam Plastics, Inc., Falcon Manufacturing of California, Inc., James Allen, and Michael AllenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Raymond Washington v. Clayton PenwellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Jeff D. v. AndrusCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989
- City of Las Vegas v. Clark CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.