Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District v. Bond
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sutherland
Appellant is an irrigation district organized as a public corporation under the laws of Idaho. In 1915, its supply of water being insufficient to irrigate the lands of all its members, it entered into a contract with the United States, at that time engaged in the construction of the Boise irrigation project, for wafer to irrigate the unsupplied lands and for the construction of a drainage system within the district. The district undertook , to represent" these lands in their relations to the government and collect from their owners and pay over to the government construction installments and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Colburn v. WilsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1913
- Twin Falls Salmon River Land & Water Co. v. CaldwellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1921
- Twin Falls Salmon River Land & Water Co. v. CaldwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Nampa & Meridian Irr. Dist. v. BondCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1923
- Schmidt v. Louisville, C. & L. Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1904
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Casitas Municipal Water District v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- Rank v. (Krug) United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1956
- United States v. Contra Costa County Water DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Foster v. Sunnyside Valley Irrigation DistrictWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- Fox v. IckesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1943
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.