Long v. Furst
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Per curiam
The defendants in error, Furst '& Thomas, are a copartnership, with their place of business at Freeport, Ill., and engaged in the general line of business of medicine companies which handle their products through local persons who go about the country in wagons and distribute same. Originally, all of these companies had local persons to act as agents and with contracts for restricted territory, and the further agreements to sell their goods at prices fixed by the company. These contracts have been uniformly held to be in violation of the statutes against price-fixing and restraint of trade.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Brooks v. J. R. Watkins Medical Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Hunt v. W. T. Rawleigh Medical Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Eng-Skell Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Gordon v. W. T. Rawleigh Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Stewart v. W. T. Rawleigh Medical Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Thomas v. BelcherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- Furst v. LucasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936