Legal Opinion
Thomas v. Belcher
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided March 7, 1939No. 28544PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGibson, J.
This is an action by a wholesaler against a retailer and his sureties to recover the purchase price of certain commodities delivered pursuant to a written contract of purchase and an alleged guaranty.
As a defense it was alleged, first, that tlhe contract between plaintiff and the principal defendant, Belcher, was in restraint of trade and void under the provisions of the Sherman Antitrust Laws (15 U. S. O. A. sec. 1, et seq.) and the statutes of this state (see. 12790, O. S. 1931, et seq., 79 Okla. Stat. Ann. sec. 1, et seq.; sec. 9492, O. S. 1931, 15 Okla. Stat. Ann. sec. 217). In this…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Brooks v. J. R. Watkins Medical Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Hunt v. W. T. Rawleigh Medical Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Patterson Furniture Co. v. ByersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
- Gordon v. W. T. Rawleigh Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Stewart v. W. T. Rawleigh Medical Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Bd. of Regents, Etc. v. Natl. Collegiate Athletic Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
- Neil v. Pennsylvania Life Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970
- Rance v. SPERRY AND HUTCHINSON COMPANYSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
- Bd. of Regents, Etc. v. Natl. Collegiate Athletic Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
- Opinion No. (1998), Oklahoma Attorney General Reports1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.