Legal Opinion

Furst v. Lucas

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 29, 1936No. 24406PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBusby, J.

This action was instituted in the district court of Caddo county on the 17th day of July, 1931, by Frank E. Furst and Fred G. Thomas, copartners doing business under the firm name of Furst & Thomas, of Freeport, Ill., as plaintiffs, against T. F. Lucas of Ft. Cobb, Okla., T. S. Churchill, and Ed Foster, as defendants. The plaintiffs sought to recover a money judgment in the sum of $1,294.64. The liability of the defendant T. F. Lucas was said to havearisen out of a written contract executed between him and the plaintiffs whereby the plaintiffs had agreed to sell to him at regular who'esale…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. United States v. Colgate & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
  2. Dr. Miles Medical Co. v. John D. Park & Sons Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  3. Federal Trade Commission v. Beech-Nut Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
  4. United States v. A. Schrader's Son, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
  5. City of Sapulpa v. YoungSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Thomas v. BelcherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API