Legal Opinion

Ellis v. . Ellis

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 6, 1930PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBbogdeN, J.

The denial of a motion made in apt time to strike from a complaint irrelevant and redundant matter affects a substantial right and is appealable. Conversely the granting of such motion is not such an interlocutory order as to foreclose review by the appellate court. Hosiery Mills v. Hosiery Mills, ante, 596. C. S., 537.

A complaint is the story of the cause or causes of action which the statute requires to be told in “a plain and concise statement . . . without unnecessary repetition.” C. S., 506. As to what constitutes “unnecessary repetition” is often times a vexing problem which can only be…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dockery v. Fairbanks-Morse Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  2. Newsom v. . NewsomSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1847

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Parrish v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  2. Pemberton v. City of GreensboroSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  3. Garrett v. RoseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  4. Pemberton v. City of GreensboroSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  5. Hill v. . StansburySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API