Legal Opinion

Western Fiberglass, Inc. v. Kirton, McConkie & Bushnell

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided March 2, 1990No. 890407-CAPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JACKSON, Judge:

Western Fiberglass, Inc. (Western) appeals a judgment based on a jury verdict which found the parties equally negligent in failing to file security instruments. The law firm of Kirton, McConkie and Bushnell (Kirton) cross-appeals the denial of costs and fees claimed under the corporate indemnity provision of the Utah Business Corporation Act, Utah Code Ann. § 16-10-4(2)(c) (Supp.1989). We affirm on both appeals.

I. NATURE OF THE CASE

Western sued Kirton claiming damages for Kirton’s legal malpractice arising out of Western’s sale of equipment to United Fiberglass, Inc. (United).…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Scharf v. BMG Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Berube v. Fashion Centre, Ltd.Utah Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Von Hake v. ThomasUtah Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Cambelt International Corp. v. DaltonUtah Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Acculog, Inc. v. PetersonUtah Supreme Court · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Fasciana v. Electronic Data Systems Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2003
  2. Behrens v. WedmoreSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Horizon Financial, F.A. v. HansenDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1992
  4. State v. SwappCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1991
  5. Sandy City v. Salt Lake CountyCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1990

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API