Legal Opinion

North Side Canal Co. v. Idaho Farms Co.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided October 26, 1939No. 6721PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GIVENS, J. —

This action grows out of the vicissitudes of a so-called “Carey Act” project organized and developed under the correlated federal 1 and state 2 statutes. For those interested an extended history of the project, adverted to and delineated at length by the respective parties herein, may be found in the cases cited in the appended footnote, 3 but the point involved herein does not depend upon or require a detailed reference thereto.

Therefore, going immediately to the ultimate question, these facts are alone pertinent and controlling.

Respondent, by various transactions unimportant…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Webster v. FallSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Nielson v. ParkerIdaho Supreme Court · 1911
  3. State v. Twin Falls-Salmon River Land & Water Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Sanderson v. Salmon River Canal Co., Ltd.Idaho Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Andrews v. North Side Canal Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1932

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Application of KaufmanIdaho Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Valier Co. v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 1950
  3. In Re RobinsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Kershaw v. Pierce Cattle Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Montierth v. DorssersIdaho Supreme Court · 2023

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API