Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Kershaw v. Pierce Cattle Co.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided June 11, 1964No. 9430PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TAYLOR, Justice.

Plaintiffs (respondents) brought this action on two counts to recover the value of hay and livestock handling facilities furnished to defendants (appellants).

Defendants admitted liability for hay furnished and filed a cross-complaint, containing three counts: to recover the value of hay furnished to plaintiffs; damages for breach of contract; and damages for wrongful attachment.

On June 12, 1962, at the time the cause was set for trial, in the presence of the district judge in chambers, the parties entered into a stipulation for the settlement and dismissal of the action. The…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Butler v. Smith's Transfer Corp.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Washington Asphalt Co. v. Harold Kaeser Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Foley v. FoleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1962
  4. Pioneer Irrigation District v. American Ditch Ass'nIdaho Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Arnett v. ThroopIdaho Supreme Court · 1954

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. DeNardo v. Calista Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Young Electric Sign Co. v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Conley v. WhittleseyIdaho Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. FIRST SEC. BANK OF IDAHO, NA v. HansenIdaho Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Butcher v. GilroyCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API