Legal Opinion
Budson Co. v. Oikari
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided April 21, 1967No. 65 C 1635PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND JUDGMENT
CAMPBELL, Chief Judge.
The complaint herein seeks to review a compensation order under the Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act as extended by the Defense Base Act. 42 U.S.C. § 1651 et seq.
All parties agree that there is no genuine issue of fact and accordingly all have filed motions for summary judgment, presenting the following questions of law.
1. The Application of the Defense Base Act
Claimant defendant was injured in his employment at Ladd Air Force Base, Alaska. The Defense Base Act, 42 U.S. C. § 1651(a) (2) at that time provided…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Davis v. Department of Labor and Industries of Wash.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Calbeck v. Travelers Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Atlantic & Gulf Stevedores, Inc. v. DonovanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1960
- John Beegan v. Brady-Hamilton Stevedore Company, Fireman's Fund Insurance Company and J. N. O'leary, Deputy Commissioner, 14th Compensation DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
3Cited by6 opinions
- Davila-Perez v. Lockheed Martin Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
- Fireman's Fund Insurance Company and Luckenbach Steamship Company, Inc. v. Robert H. Bergeron, Deputy Commissioner, United States Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Lee McKinney v. J. J. O'leary, Deputy Commissioner, Fourteenth Compensation DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
- Peerless Insurance v. HillDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1969
- Davila-Perez v. Lockheed Martin CorpCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.