Legal Opinion

Rolland v. Porterfield

California Supreme Court

Decided August 3, 1920No. L. A. No. 6064PublishedCited by 47 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtLennon, J.

This action was brought by plaintiff against the executrix of the estate of Alfred E. Blake, deceased, to recover the sum of five thousand five hundred dollars. The complaint contains two counts. The first count is based upon a promissory note for five thousand dollars, alleged to have been “made, executed and delivered” by decedent; the second count seeks to recover the sum of five hundred dollars, alleged to have been loaned to decedent by plaintiff. The trial court rendered judgment in favor of the defendant and against the plaintiff on both counts of the complaint, and plaintiff appeals…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Estate of BlakeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Robinson v. RobinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Watson v. WatsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Fox v. MonahanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
  5. Hoppe v. RobbCalifornia Supreme Court · 1851

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Universal Sales Corp. v. California Press Manufacturing Co.California Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Treadwell v. NickelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Berry v. ChaplinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  4. Neel v. Mannings, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1942
  5. People v. HorowitzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API