Legal Opinion

Hoppe v. Robb

California Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1851PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the district court of the sixth judicial district.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court,

BeNNett, J.

The action was for money loaned. The question for determination at the trial was whether the money was advanced as a loan, or by way of subscription for the purpose of establishing a newspaper at San José. There was conflicting evidence upon this point, and the judge of the district court found that the money was advanced as a subscription.

*374"We bare frequently held that we would not review the verdict of a jury upon a question of fact, where there was conflicting or contradictory evidence, upon which the verdict was based. The same rule applies to the finding of a…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rolland v. PorterfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  2. McGrath v. Basich Brothers Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1935
  3. Sears v. SchwartzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  4. Bernard v. RaglanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1856

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API