Legal Opinion

Farmers Co-operative Elevator Co. v. Enge

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 17, 1914No. Nos. 18,709—(219)PublishedCited by 5 opinions

After the former appeal reported in 122 Minn. 316, 142 N. W. ‘328, the case was tried before Kingsley, J., who denied defendant ■company’s motions to dismiss the case and for a directed verdict, ¡and a jury which returned a verdict for $2,312.33 in favor of plaintiff. From an order denying its motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial, defendant Massachusetts Bonding <& Insurance Co. appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtPhilip E. Brown, J.

Plaintiff prevailed against the Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance Co., in an action to recover from defendant Enge the net proceeds, exceeding $2,000, of two carloads of wheat alleged to have been consigned by plaintiff to him as a’licensed commission merchant, and from his co-defendant, above named, as surety, on a statutory bond. The latter appealed from an order denying its motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial.

The complaint was sustained as against a general demurrer, in 122 Minn. 316, 142 N. W. 328, where its substance is detailed. The pertinent statutory…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Fay v. Bankers Surety Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  2. Farmers Co-Operative Elevator Co. v. EngeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Holzer v. Tonka Bay Yachts & Marine Sales, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  2. State v. Rogers & RogersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
  3. Bozied v. EdgertonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  4. Kramer Equity Elevator v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  5. Terry Lusk v. C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API