State v. Rogers & Rogers
Supreme Court of Minnesota
From an order of the Railroad and Warehouse Commission fixing the commissions to he charged by any live stock commission merchant at any public stock yard for the buying and selling of live stock, Rogers & Rogers appealed to the district court for Dakota county. The matter was heard by Converse, J., who vacated the order of the commission. From an order denying its motion for a new trial, the state appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtDibeul, J.
The defendants, commission men doing business at the South St. Paul stock-yards, appealed to the district court of Dakota county from an order of the. Railroad and Warehouse Commission of date January 5, 1920, establishing, pursuant to the provisions of Daws 1919 (Ex. Sess. p. 58, c. 39), a schedule of charges for live stock commission men at public stock-yards. The district court vacated the order. The state appeals.
The questions, roughly stated, are whether Congress by the Food Control Act authorized control of public stock-yard facilities and activities including the business and charges…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Munn v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- German Alliance Insurance v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Cotting v. Kansas City Stock Yards Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. North Dakota Ex Rel. LangerSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Dakota Central Telephone Co. v. South Dakota Ex Rel. PayneSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Carnes v. St. Paul Union Stockyards Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- De Vries v. Sig Ellingson & Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1951
- Grisim v. South St. Paul Live Stock ExchangeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
- Carnes v. St. Paul Union Stockyards Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1928