Legal Opinion

Farmers Co-Operative Elevator Co. v. Enge

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 3, 1913No. Nos. 18,078—(196)PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Action in the district court for Ramsey county against defendant Enge and Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance Company to recover $2,519.21 from defendant Enge and $2,000 from defendant company. Defendant company demurred to the complaint upon the ground that it did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action against it. From an order overruling the demurrer, Kelly, J., defendant company appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, C. J.

The complaint alleges that plaintiff is a ■ corporation, organized under the laws of this state and, at the times stated therein, engaged in the business of buying and selling grain and other farm products at Atwater, this state; that defendant Enge, in April, 1911, was a commission merchant residing and doing business as such at the city of Minneapolis; being duly licensed as such by the warehouse commission under and pursuant to sections 2114 to 2120, B. L. 1905; that at the time the license was so issued to Enge he duly executed to the state the bond required by the statute referred to,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Beek v. WagenerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
  2. Grant v. BerrisfordSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Wenger v. WengerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
  2. State v. Minneapolis Milk Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  3. Rambeck v. La BreeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
  4. State Ex Rel. Rajala v. RiggSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  5. Farmers Co-operative Elevator Co. v. EngeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API