Legal Opinion

Tonkin v. Kenworthy

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided January 24, 1934PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hehek, J.

Relator, a citizen, resident and taxpayer of the village of Ridgewood, in the county of Bergen, was granted leave of this court, under section 1 of an act entitled “An act relating to informations in the nature of a quo warranto” (3 Comp. Stat., p. 4210), to exhibit in the name of the attorney-general an information in the nature of a quo warranto against defendant, to inquire by what warrant defendant claims to hold the office of executive secretary of the New Jersey State League of Municipalities. Leave was allowed without prejudice in…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. BrownTennessee Supreme Court · 1847
  2. Brooks v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1911
  3. Cochran v. McClearySupreme Court of Iowa · 1867
  4. Reynolds v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1846
  5. Bonynge v. FrankSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1916

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Golaine v. CardinaleNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
  2. O'CONNOR v. CalandrilloNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1971
  3. State Ex Rel. Weitz v. PrestonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1934
  4. "Regular Democratic Club" v. TracyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API