Legal Opinion

Bonynge v. Frank

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 19, 1916PublishedCited by 4 opinions

On appeal from the Supreme Court.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Swayze, J.

Much difficulty has been caused by the manner in which the jnúnted case is made up. We have only the information in the nature of a quo warranto, a demurrer by the defendant Cerrata, a separate demurrer by the defendant Moses, and a joint- judgment against both. The other defendants are not Shown to have been brought into court. The practice is set forth in Attorney-General v. Delaware and Bound Brook Railroad Co., 38 N. J. L. 282. It is unfortunate that in this state of the record we can deal only with the cases of Cerrata and Moses.

The real…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. KearnSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1891

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Haack v. RanieriNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1964
  2. NJ ST. LODGE-FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE v. AaronNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
  3. Tonkin v. KenworthySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1934
  4. Omaha National Bank v. West Lawn Mausoleum Ass'nNebraska Supreme Court · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API