Bonynge v. Frank
Supreme Court of New Jersey
On appeal from the Supreme Court.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Swayze, J.
Much difficulty has been caused by the manner in which the jnúnted case is made up. We have only the information in the nature of a quo warranto, a demurrer by the defendant Cerrata, a separate demurrer by the defendant Moses, and a joint- judgment against both. The other defendants are not Shown to have been brought into court. The practice is set forth in Attorney-General v. Delaware and Bound Brook Railroad Co., 38 N. J. L. 282. It is unfortunate that in this state of the record we can deal only with the cases of Cerrata and Moses.
The real…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State v. KearnSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1891
3Cited by4 opinions
- Haack v. RanieriNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1964
- NJ ST. LODGE-FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE v. AaronNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
- Tonkin v. KenworthySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1934
- Omaha National Bank v. West Lawn Mausoleum Ass'nNebraska Supreme Court · 1954