Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Weitz v. Preston

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided August 30, 1934PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered bjr

Perskie, J.

The relator, Carl Weitz, claiming the right to act as general manager, trust officer and title officer of the ClifEside Park Title and Guarantee and Trust Company, obtained a rule to show cause why a writ of quo warranto, &c., should not issue directed to the respondent, Joseph A. Preston, to show by what warrant he holds, &c., the same offices.

The record discloses that on February 4th, 1933, the board of directors of the bank adopted a resolution “that Mr. Joseph A. Preston be engaged as general manager for one week and from week to week…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Fredericks v. Board of HealthSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1912
  2. Schilstra v. Van Den HeuvelSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1914
  3. Tompkins v. TompkinsNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1920
  4. Barna v. KirczowNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1906
  5. In re the Election for Secretary of the United Towns Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1909

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. "Regular Democratic Club" v. TracyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1939
  2. Scott v. CholmondeleyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1941
  3. Ebenezer Baptist Church v. BarberUnited States District Court · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API