Legal Opinion

City of Houston v. Feeser

Texas Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 1890No. 2872PublishedCited by 32 opinions

Appeal from Harris. Tried below before Hon. James Masterson.

1Opinion of the Court

STAYTON, Chief Justice.

This was a suit brought by appellee.against the city of Houston to recover amount of certain license taxes paid by appellee as claimed by him for the privilege of carrying on the business of a butcher in the city. This tax amounted to the sum of $15 a month, and the evidence showed that this sum had been paid by the appellee for a period of several years previous to the institution of this suit. Judgment was rendered in appellee’s favor for the sum of $277.50, the same being the full amount of plaintiff’s claim except that portion of it barred by the statute of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Railroad Co. v. CommissionersSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Taylor v. HallTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Galveston City Co. v. City of GalvestonTexas Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Town of Edinburg v. HackneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  5. Bank of Santa Rosa v. ChalfantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1877

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Dallas County Community College District v. BoltonTexas Supreme Court · 2005
  2. BMG Direct Marketing, Inc. v. PeakeTexas Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Austin Nat. Bank v. SheppardTexas Commission of Appeals · 1934
  4. Austin National Bank v. SheppardTexas Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Camacho v. Samaniego, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1997

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API