Legal Opinion

Austin National Bank v. Sheppard

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 2, 1934No. 6607PublishedCited by 83 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Judge CRITZ

delivered the opinion of the Commission of Appeals, Section A.

This is an original mandamus proceeding instituted by Austin National Bank as relator, against George H. Sheppard, State Comptroller, and Charley Lockhart, State Treasurer, as respondents. ■ The facts are undisputed. They are as follows:

At all times, including and since March 7, 1919, Barber Asphalt Company has been a foreign corporation, duly incorporated under the laws of West Virginia, with a permit to do business in this State. On said date the company filed with the Secretary of State of this State its…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. ElliottCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
  2. Gaar, Scott & Co. v. ShannonSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  3. City of Houston v. FeeserTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Nichols v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1895
  5. State v. HaldemanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by83 opinions

  1. Dallas County Community College District v. BoltonTexas Supreme Court · 2005
  2. BMG Direct Marketing, Inc. v. PeakeTexas Supreme Court · 2005
  3. National Biscuit Co. v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Highland Church of Christ v. PowellTexas Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Texas Public Building Authority v. MattoxTexas Supreme Court · 1985

78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API