Legal Opinion
Austin Nat. Bank v. Sheppard
Texas Commission of Appeals
Decided May 2, 1934No. 1764—6607PublishedCited by 124 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CRITZ, Commissioner.
This is an original mandamus proceeding instituted by Austin National Bank as relator against George H. Sheppard, state comptroller, and Charley Lockhart, state treasurer, as respondents. The facts are undisputed. They are as follows:
At all times, including and since March 7, 1919, Barber Asphalt Company has been a foreign corporation, duly incorporated under the laws of West Virginia, with a permit to do business in this state. On said date the company filed with the secretary of state of this state its application for a permit to do business in Texas. This application…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State v. ElliottCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
- Gaar, Scott & Co. v. ShannonSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- City of Houston v. Thomas Emery's SonsTexas Supreme Court · 1890
- City of Houston v. FeeserTexas Supreme Court · 1890
- Nichols v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1895
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by124 opinions
- Dallas County Community College District v. BoltonTexas Supreme Court · 2005
- BMG Direct Marketing, Inc. v. PeakeTexas Supreme Court · 2005
- National Biscuit Co. v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1940
- Highland Church of Christ v. PowellTexas Supreme Court · 1982
- Texas Public Building Authority v. MattoxTexas Supreme Court · 1985
119 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.