In Re Nicholls
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtCashin, J.
Petitioner was convicted in the police court of the city and county of San Francisco of a misdemeanor, as a punishment was sentenced to pay a fine, and in default of such payment to be imprisoned. Having been committed pursuant to the judgment he has applied for a writ of habeas corpus.
The complaint in the action, which was prosecuted in the name of the People of the State of California, charged a violation of an ordinance of the city and county known as the “Plumbing Law,” making it a misdemeanor for any person to install or to alter the plumbing in any new or old building or in any premises…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- In Re HolmesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- In Re SpencerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Ex parte FiskeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- In Re Application of GutierrezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- Robert v. Police Court of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1905
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Sullivan v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Cook v. MasonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Leischner v. KnightMontana Supreme Court · 1959
- Oppenheimer v. Clifton's Brookdale, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1950
- Fallen Leaf Protection Assn. v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.