State v. Sneed
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BRANCH, Justice.
The . sole question presented by this appeal is whether defendant was denied effective assistance of counsel as guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution and Article I, Sections 19 and 23 of the Constitution of North Carolina.
Defendant contends that the testimony of State’s witnesses Levy Lowe and James Dennis Mack and certain other related evidence offered by the State became available solely through statements procured from defendant as a result of Constitutionally inadequate representation by his court-appointed counsel. Defendant contends this…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Mooney v. HolohanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Avery v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Ellis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- State v. BraswellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- State v. HutchinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- State v. WeaverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- State v. MisenheimerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- State v. PhillipsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2011
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.