Legal Opinion

Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Bynum

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided February 1, 1946No. 11239PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALLER, Circuit Judge.

This is another case involving the price that should be paid the royalty owner for gas taken from a well in the Panhandle Field of Texas. The royalty provisions in Plaintiffs’ contract1 are identical with those construed in Shamrock Oil & Gas Corporation v. Coffee, 5 Cir., 140 F.2d 409. The only substantial difference between this and the Shamrock case is that in the latter it was admitted that there existed in the field a market price for the gas, while in the present case the plaintiffs say, and insist that they have proven, that no market price for their gas had ever…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Thompson v. Consolidated Gas Utilities Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Shamrock Oil & Gas Corporation v. CoffeeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1944
  3. Sartor v. United Gas Public Service Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1936
  4. Phillips Petroleum Co. v. OchsnerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1944
  5. Consolidated Gas Utilities Corporation v. ThompsonDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Skidmore v. Baltimore & OR Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
  2. Texas Oil & Gas Corporation v. VelaTexas Supreme Court · 1968
  3. J. M. Huber Corporation v. William Harvey Denman and Jay Pumphrey, Trustees of the Estate of S. B. Burnett, DeceasedCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
  4. Weymouth v. Colorado Interstate Gas Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
  5. Zara Foster v. The Atlantic Refining Company, the Atlantic Refining Company v. Zara FosterCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API