Legal Opinion

J. M. Huber Corporation v. William Harvey Denman and Jay Pumphrey, Trustees of the Estate of S. B. Burnett, Deceased

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided September 20, 1966No. 22272PublishedCited by 82 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHN R. BROWN, Circuit Judge.

As with another case this day decided, 1 this one, thought by the parties to be a private controversy, turns out to have transcendent public interest issues. In each, besides deciding the private law questions, we direct a reference to the Federal Power Commission for it to determine under the doctrine of primary jurisdiction the jurisdiction of the FPC over rates to be paid for gas royalty. Post argument consideration led the Court to the view that in the ultimate resolution of private law issues, there were problems of great public interest. The Court by…

2Cases cited66 opinions

  1. Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. United States v. Western Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  3. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Abilene Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
  4. Leedom v. KyneSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. Sunshine Anthracite Coal Co. v. AdkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by82 opinions

  1. Atlantis Development Corporation, Ltd. v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
  2. Pennzoil Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  3. Exxon Corp. v. MiddletonTexas Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Lightcap v. Mobil Oil CorporationSupreme Court of Kansas · 1977
  5. Placid Oil Company, Sola II v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973

77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API