Legal Opinion

Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Ochsner

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided December 15, 1944No. 10847PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUTCHESON, Circuit Judge.

The suit was for royalty on dry sweet gas produced by appellant from lands of appellee in Moore. County, Texas. The claim was: (1) That within the meaning of the lease, “the gas was used off the premises” for light and fuel purposes; (2) that the gas had no market value for such purposes at the well; and (3) that, therefore, lessor was entitled to be paid its “value at the mouth of the well” for light and fuel purposes by resort to, and proof of, all relevant factors. The defense was: (1) that though there was no market at the well for the gas for light and fuel…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. International-Great Northern R. v. CaseyTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932
  2. Arkansas Natural Gas Co. v. SartorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1935
  3. Wall v. United Gas Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1934
  4. Lone Star Gas Co. v. StineTexas Commission of Appeals · 1931
  5. Danciger Oil & Refineries, Inc. v. Hamill Drilling Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1943

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Phillips Petroleum Co. v. BynumCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1946
  2. Phillips Petroleum Co. v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1946
  3. Texas Oil & Gas Corporation v. VelaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966
  4. Kingery v. Continental Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  5. Phillips Petroleum Co. v. RecordCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1944

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API