Legal Opinion

United States v. Durham

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided January 27, 1986No. 46,088; NMCM 82-4447PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

2Per curiam

Pursuant to his pleas, appellant was convicted by a special court-martial, military judge alone, of larceny, in violation of Article 121, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 921. The military judge sentenced appellant to a bad-conduct discharge, confinement for 45 days, and forfeiture of $367.00 pay. The convening authority approved the sentence, but the supervisory authority reduced the confinement to 24 days. The Court of Military Review affirmed. We granted review to consider whether the larceny specification was fatally defective because it failed to identify…

3Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. CareUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
  2. United States v. SellUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953
  3. United States v. AutreyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1961
  4. United States v. WilliamsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1962
  5. United States v. HoskinsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. JohnsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990
  2. United States v. JohnsonU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1988
  3. United States v. BakerUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 1995
  4. United States v. BrownU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API