Legal Opinion
Covert v. Randles
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided February 27, 1939No. Civil No. 4044PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRoss, C. J.
James D. Randles and F. Ray Risdon, members of the bar of the state of California, commenced this action against Nellie P. Covert to recover compensation for legal services claimed by them to have been rendered defendant under and by virtue of the following contract:
“March 27, 1936.
“F. Ray Risdon and Jas. D. Randles
“Gentlemen: This will be your authority to represent me in endeavoring to recover for me approximately $41,875.00 worth of bonds that have been stolen from me, or their equivalent in cash. The consideration for these services will be as follows: $250.00 cash retainer fee, and 8% of…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Walker v. WrightArizona Supreme Court · 1925
3Cited by11 opinions
- Matter of SwartzArizona Supreme Court · 1984
- State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Ins. Comm'rCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
- Gable v. Colonial InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
- Lindsey v. University of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1987
- Parry v. Allstate InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2009
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.