Walker v. Wright
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, J.
John B. Wright and John C. Haynes, hereinafter called plaintiffs, were practicing attorneys in the city of Tucson. On August 24, 1923, they were retained in their professional capacity by Roxie Walker, hereinafter called defendant, to adjust some difficulties between himself and his wife. He paid them a retainer of One Hundred Dollars ($100.00) cash and gave them four postdated checks of Fifty Dollars ($50.00) each, payable in September and October. A written contract of employment was entered into, which reads, in so far as it is material to the determination of this case, as follows:
“Agreeme…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ingersoll v. CoramSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- French v. CunninghamIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. SemmesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1890
- Polsley & Son v. AndersonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1874
- Harris v. RootMontana Supreme Court · 1903
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State Farm Mutual Insurance v. St. Joseph's HospitalArizona Supreme Court · 1971
- Covert v. RandlesArizona Supreme Court · 1939
- Bates v. MitchellArizona Supreme Court · 1948