Legal Opinion

McFadden v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided May 24, 2021No. 8:19-cv-00629Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND (SOUTHERN DIVISION) PANDORA MCFADDEN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA ) TRANSIT AUTHORITY, ) Civil Case No. GLS 19-629 ) Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) C T STANLEY AND SON, INC., ) ) Third-Party Defendant. ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION Pending before this Court are the following motions and responses thereto: (1) a motion for summary judgment filed by Third-Party Defendant C T Stanley and Son, Inc. (“Stanley”) (ECF No. 35) (“Stanley’s Motion”); (2) a motion for summary judgment filed by Defendant…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Masson v. New Yorker Magazine, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Arnold G. Barwick v. The Celotex Corporation, Keene Corporation, Pittsburgh Corning Corporation, H.K. Porter, Forty-Eight Insulations, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API